TyG指数与非糖尿病患者心房颤动射频消融术后1年内复发的相关性研究

李涛, 李贤月, 张佩玉, 等. TyG指数与非糖尿病患者心房颤动射频消融术后1年内复发的相关性研究[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2024, 40(10): 833-838. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2024.10.011
引用本文: 李涛, 李贤月, 张佩玉, 等. TyG指数与非糖尿病患者心房颤动射频消融术后1年内复发的相关性研究[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2024, 40(10): 833-838. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2024.10.011
LI Tao, LI Xianyue, ZHANG Peiyu, et al. Correlation study of TyG index and recurrence of atrial fibrillation within 1 year after radiofrequency ablation in non-diabetic patients[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2024, 40(10): 833-838. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2024.10.011
Citation: LI Tao, LI Xianyue, ZHANG Peiyu, et al. Correlation study of TyG index and recurrence of atrial fibrillation within 1 year after radiofrequency ablation in non-diabetic patients[J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2024, 40(10): 833-838. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2024.10.011

TyG指数与非糖尿病患者心房颤动射频消融术后1年内复发的相关性研究

详细信息

Correlation study of TyG index and recurrence of atrial fibrillation within 1 year after radiofrequency ablation in non-diabetic patients

More Information
  • 目的 探讨甘油三酯葡萄糖(TyG)指数与射频消融术后心房颤动(房颤)1年内复发之间的关联。方法 回顾性选取200例首次行射频消融术的房颤患者,收集患者的临床资料和术后12个月的随访数据,观察患者是否出现房颤复发,依据随访结果将患者分为复发组和未复发组。比较两组TyG指数的差异,分析影响房颤复发的危险因素及独立预测因子。结果 相较于非复发组,房颤复发组患者的TyG指数明显升高(8.70±0.06 vs 8.48±0.04,P < 0.05)。多因素回归分析显示,TyG指数是射频消融术后房颤复发的独立危险因素。受试者工作特征曲线示房颤复发TyG指数曲线下面积为0.627(95%CI0.541~0.714,P < 0.05),预测房颤复发的截断值为8.59。结论 术前高水平TyG指数提示房颤患者射频消融术后具有较高的复发风险。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  单因素Cox回归分析

    Figure 1.  Univariate Cox regression analysis

    图 2  多因素Cox回归分析

    Figure 2.  Multivariate Cox regression analysis

    图 3  TyG指数预测房颤1年内复发的ROC曲线

    Figure 3.  ROC curve

    图 4  不同TyG水平的患者射频导管消融后1年内无复发的生存曲线

    Figure 4.  Kaplan-Meier survival curves

    表 1  两组基线资料比较

    Table 1.  General data 例(%), X±S, M(P25, P75)

    项目 复发组(41例) 未复发组(159例) t/Z/χ2 P
    男性 26(63.4) 105(66.0) 0.099 0.753
    年龄/岁 60.68±1.7 61.03±0.74 0.206 0.837
    BMI/(kg/m2) 26.20±0.55 25.86±0.25 0.610 0.545
    高血压病 22(53.7) 89(56.0) 0.071 0.790
    冠心病 9(22.0) 39(24.5) 0.119 0.730
    饮酒史 9(22.0) 39(24.5) 0.119 0.730
    吸烟史 12(29.2) 56(35.2) 0.515 0.473
    房颤类型
      阵发性 21(51.2) 83(52.2) 0.013 0.911
      持续性 20(48.8) 76(47.8)
    CHA2DS2-VASc评分/分 2(1,3) 2(1,3) -0.545 0.586
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  两组实验室指标比较

    Table 2.  Comparison of laboratory indicators X±S, M(P25, P75)

    项目 复发组(41例) 未复发组(159例) t/Z P
    WBC/(×109/L) 5.84±0.18 5.87(4.94,6.94) -0.209 0.835
    NEUT/(×109/L) 3.19±0.13 3.12(2.52,3.94) -0.159 0.874
    LYM/(×109/L) 2.00±0.09 2.04(1.57,2.43) -0.079 0.937
    NLR 1.61(1.27,2.06) 1.57(1.22,2.06) -0.490 0.624
    MXD/(×109/L) 0.46±0.02 0.46(0.37,0.56) -0.245 0.806
    EOS/(×109/L) 0.11(0.05,0.15) 0.11(0.06,0.18) -0.091 0.928
    BASO/(×109/L) 0.03(0.02,0.05) 0.03(0.02,0.05) -1.039 0.299
    HGB/(g/L) 150(137,160) 148.49±1.34 -0.045 0.964
    PLT/(×109/L) 196(169,235) 202(169,231) -0.169 0.865
    UREA/(mmol/L) 5.43(5.01,6.79) 5.61(4.75,6.76) -0.012 0.905
    FBG/(mmol/L) 5.17±0.11 4.93(4.52,5.28) -1.658 0.097
    UA/(μmol/L) 358(310,428) 339(288,418) -0.944 0.345
    TP/(g/L) 68.37±0.79 67.17±0.47 -1.339 0.181
    ALB/(g/L) 40.91±0.55 40.00±0.28 -1.300 0.194
    GLB/(g/L) 27.47±0.53 26.78±0.38 -0.758 0.448
    A/G 1.515±0.04 1.500(1.30,1.66) -0.312 0.755
    TG/(mmol/L) 1.48(1.13,2.06) 1.21(0.88,1.74) -2.323 0.020
    TC/(mmol/L) 4.07±0.18 3.77(3.13,4.40) -1.164 0.245
    LDL-C/(mmol/L) 2.46±0.14 2.21(1.61,2.69) -1.628 0.103
    TSH/(μIU/mL) 2.08(1.49,4.34) 2.08(1.33,3.22) -1.048 0.295
    T3/(ng/mL) 1.06±0.02 1.10±0.01 1.375 0.171
    T4/(μg/dL) 7.4(6.5,7.9) 7.4(6.5,8.3) -0.708 0.479
    糖化血红蛋白/% 5.65±0.55 5.70(5.50,5.90) -1.336 0.181
    D-D/(μg/mL) 0.16(0.11,0.25) 0.18(0.12,0.27) -1.166 0.244
    TyG指数 8.70±0.06 8.48±0.04 2.933 0.004
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  两组患者超声影像学指标对比

    Table 3.  Ultrasonic imaging index X±S, M(P25, P75)

    指标 复发组(41例) 未复发组(159例) t/Z P
    右房上下径/mm 51.93±1.12 50(45,56) -0.730 0.465
    右房左右径/mm 44.46±1.06 42(38,49) -0.836 0.403
    主肺动脉内径/mm 24.78±0.38 25(23,26) -0.061 0.951
    LVEED/mm 49.27±0.61 49(47,52) -0.434 0.664
    LAD/mm 43.95±0.86 41.66±0.48 2.215 0.028
    LVEF/% 64.73(62.02,67.42) 65.81(61.90,68.97) -1.102 0.271
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  TG与TyG指数共线性统计

    Table 4.  Collinearity statistics of TG and TyG index

    项目 容差 VIF
    TG 0.188 5.311
    TyG指数 0.187 5.356
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    黄青云, 李文彦, 杨曼, 等. 射频消融联合左心耳封堵治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的长期有效性及安全性研究[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2023, 39(7): 541-546. https://lcxxg.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2023.07.010

    [2]

    Hindricks G. Corrigendum to: 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association(EHRA)of the ESC[J]. Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(40): 4194. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab648

    [3]

    Poole JE. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the CABANA Trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020, 75(25): 3105-3118. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.065

    [4]

    Erhard N, Metzner A, Fink T. Late arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation: incidence, mechanisms and clinical implications[J]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol, 2022.33(1): 71-76. doi: 10.1007/s00399-021-00836-6

    [5]

    Tao LC. Triglyceride-glucose index as a marker in cardiovascular diseases: landscape and limitations[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2022, 21(1): 68. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01511-x

    [6]

    Chen S. Association between triglyceride-glucose index and atrial fibrillation: A retrospective observational study[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2022, 13: 1047927. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1047927

    [7]

    Tang Q. The pre-ablation triglyceride-glucose index predicts late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation in non-diabetic adults[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2022, 22(1): 219. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02657-y

    [8]

    Kosmas CE. Insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease[J]. J Int Med Res, 2023, 51(3): 3000605231164548. doi: 10.1177/03000605231164548

    [9]

    DeFronzo RA. Insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: the missing links. The Claude Bernard Lecture 2009[J]. Diabetologia, 2010, 53(7): 1270-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1684-1

    [10]

    Yaribeygi H. Insulin resistance: Review of the underlying molecular mechanisms[J]. J Cell Physiol, 2019, 234(6): 8152-8161. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27603

    [11]

    Staerk L. Atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical outcomes[J]. Circ Res, 2017, 120(9): 1501-1517. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.309732

    [12]

    O'Keefe EL. Prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation via risk factor modification[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2021, 160: 46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.042

    [13]

    Chan YH. Atrial fibrillation and its arrhythmogenesis associated with insulin resistance[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2019, 18(1): 125. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0928-8

    [14]

    Wang Z. Effect of insulin resistance on recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther, 2023, 37(4): 705-713. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07317-z

    [15]

    Buist TJ, Zipes DP, Elvan A. Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies and technologies: past, present, and future[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2021, 110(6): 775-788. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01751-5

    [16]

    Zhang Y. Intermittent fasting attenuates obesity-related atrial fibrillation via SIRT3-mediated insulin resistance mitigation[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2023, 1869(4): 166638. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2023.166638

    [17]

    Ling Y, Fu C, Fan Q, et al. Triglyceride-glucose index and new-onset atrial fibrillation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 838761. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.838761

    [18]

    Barzegar N, Tohidi M, Hasheminia M, et al. The impact of triglyceride-glucose index on incident cardiovascular events during 16 years of follow-up: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2020, 19(1): 155. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01121-5

    [19]

    孙梓宜, 王子涵, 陈颖, 等. TyG指数联合血管功能指标对冠状动脉狭窄程度的预测价值[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2022, 38(1): 17-21. https://lcxxg.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.01.004

    [20]

    Duran EK. Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein cholesterol, small dense LDL cholesterol, and incident cardiovascular disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020.75(17): 2122-2135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.059

    [21]

    Samuel VT, Shulman GI. The pathogenesis of insulin resistance: integrating signaling pathways and substrate flux[J]. J Clin Invest, 2016, 126(1): 12-22. doi: 10.1172/JCI77812

    [22]

    Zakynthinos GE, Tsolaki V, Oikonomou E, et al. Metabolic syndrome and atrial fibrillation: different entities or combined disorders[J]. J Pers Med, 2023, 13(9): 110.

    [23]

    Scridon A, Dobreanu D, Chevalier P, et al. Inflammation, a link between obesity and atrial fibrillation[J]. Inflamm Res, 2015, 64(6): 383-393. doi: 10.1007/s00011-015-0827-8

    [24]

    Liu X. U-shaped association between the triglyceride-glucose index and atrial fibrillation incidence in a general population without known cardiovascular disease[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2023, 22(1): 118. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01777-9

    [25]

    张宁, 叶宝兰, 程雪妮. 射频消融术后心房颤动复发的影响因素分析[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2022, 7(34): 41-43.

  • 加载中

(4)

(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  828
  • PDF下载数:  301
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-06-14
刊出日期:  2024-10-13

目录